Who was Charlie Kirk?
GoogleAI Mode: “Charles James Kirk (1993–2025) was a prominent American right-wing political activist, media personality, and a central figure in the MAGA movement. He was best known as the co-founder and executive director of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), an organization dedicated to mobilizing conservative students on high school and college campuses.
Early Life and Career
Background: Born in Arlington Heights, Illinois, Kirk became politically active in high school, volunteering for political campaigns and writing for Breitbart News.
Turning Point USA: In 2012, at age 18, Kirk co-founded TPUSA with activist Bill Montgomery. The organization grew into a national network with chapters at over 2,000 campuses.
Media Presence: He hosted The Charlie Kirk Show, a daily radio program and top-rated podcast, and authored several books, including the bestseller The MAGA Doctrine (2020).
Political Influence and Views
Trump Ally: Kirk was a key ally to Donald Trump and his family, particularly Donald Trump Jr. He played a significant role in mobilizing young voters for Trump’s 2024 campaign and assisted in staffing the incoming administration.
Ideology: His positions were characterized by traditional conservatism, Christian nationalism, and right-wing populism. He was a vocal opponent of abortion, gun control, and LGBTQ+ rights, and frequently criticized the Civil Rights Act and the “woke” ideology he believed was dominant in universities.
Controversies: Kirk was often criticized for spreading misinformation regarding COVID-19, the 2020 election, and “replacement theory”. His Professor Watchlist was also widely condemned for allegedly harassing liberal academics.
Assassination and Legacy
Death: Kirk was assassinated on September 10, 2025, at the age of 31. He was shot while speaking at a TPUSA debate event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah.
Investigation: Authorities identified the shooter as 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, who allegedly acted due to a stated hatred for Kirk’s rhetoric.
Posthumous Honors: In late 2025, Kirk was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Donald Trump.
Family: He is survived by his wife, Erika Frantzve, and their two children. Erika was appointed CEO of Turning Point USA following his death.”
What were Charlie Kirk’s views on the Civil Rights Movement and Martin Luther King Jr.?
GoogleAI Mode: “In recent years, Charlie Kirk significantly shifted his public stance on Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement, moving from praise to sharp condemnation.
Views on Martin Luther King Jr.
Previous Praise: Early in his career, Kirk frequently lauded King as a “hero” and a “civil rights icon”. Turning Point USA (TPUSA) even sold merchandise featuring King’s image and quotes.
Reversal in 2023–2024: Kirk began publicly denouncing King, calling him “awful,” a “bad guy,” and “not a good person”.
“Mythology” Critique: He argued that a “mythology” had been built around King, whom he described as a “sacred cow” of modern America. He suggested that King’s legacy had become a “proto-DEI ideology” that harmed Black America.
Discrediting Campaign: In early 2024, Kirk launched a campaign intended to “tell the truth” about King, echoing decades-old FBI-led smears regarding King’s personal character.
Views on the Civil Rights Movement
Opposition to the Civil Rights Act: Kirk explicitly called the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 a “huge mistake”.
“Anti-White Weapon”: He claimed the Act “created a beast” that had since transformed into an “anti-white weapon,” which he believed laid the legal groundwork for modern diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and affirmative action.
Constitutional Critique: He argued that federal courts often incorrectly treated the Civil Rights Act as if it were the actual Constitution, using it to “get rid of the First Amendment”.
Juneteenth: Kirk opposed making Juneteenth a federal holiday, labeling it “anti-American” and “neo-segregationist”.”
This drastic change reminds me of J.D. Vance’s change of heart about Trump. Are they similar?
GoogleAI Mode: “While J.D. Vance and Charlie Kirk both underwent highly publicized ideological shifts, the nature of their changes and the personal dynamic between the two men differ in key ways.
The Nature of Their Ideological Shifts
J.D. Vance (Trump Critic to Trump Ally): Vance’s shift was primarily political and personal. In 2016, he was a “Never Trump” conservative who famously called Trump “America’s Hitler”. By 2021, he had become a staunch supporter, attributing his change to seeing Trump’s policies in action and viewing him as the only figure capable of challenging “globalism”.
Charlie Kirk (MLK Hero Worship to MLK Critic): Kirk’s shift was cultural and historical. For years, he celebrated Martin Luther King Jr. as a hero, but in 2023–2024, he began denouncing King as a “bad guy” and labeled the Civil Rights Act a “huge mistake” that laid the groundwork for modern DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) policies.
Personal and Political Connections
Despite these differing shifts, Vance and Kirk were close allies and friends until Kirk’s death in September 2025.
Mutual Skepticism: Vance noted in a 2025 tribute that both he and Kirk were initially skeptical of Donald Trump in 2016 before becoming central figures in his movement.
Strategic Partnership: Kirk was one of the first people Vance called when considering a Senate run in 2021. Kirk played a pivotal role in Vance’s career by introducing him to key donors and Donald Trump Jr., and he later heavily lobbied for Vance to be selected as Trump’s running mate.
Succession and Legacy: Following Kirk’s assassination, Vance has become a primary defender of Kirk’s legacy, even hosting a memorial episode of The Charlie Kirk Show from the White House to vow a crackdown on the “left-wing networks” he blames for the violence.
Summary of Similarities and Differences
Feature
Original Stance
J.D. Vance
Radical critic of Donald Trump
Charlie Kirk
Hero worshiper of MLK Jr.
Feature
New Stance
J.D. Vance
Trump’s “heir apparent” and VP
Charlie Kirk
Vocal critic of MLK and Civil Rights Act
Feature
Motivation
J.D. Vance
Populist economic nationalism
Charlie Kirk
Cultural warfare against “woke” ideology
Feature
Relationship
J.D. Vance
Viewed Kirk as a “true friend” and mentor
Charlie Kirk
Viewed Vance as a “generational talent”.”
Where they influenced by others to make these drastic positional changes?
GoogleAI Mode: “Both J.D. Vance and Charlie Kirk were deeply influenced by a specific network of “New Right” intellectuals, tech billionaires, and media strategists who prioritize “post-liberal” or nationalist ideologies over traditional conservatism.
Common Influences
Peter Thiel: The billionaire venture capitalist is a primary bridge between the two. Thiel formerly employed Vance at his investment firm and provided $15 million in funding to launch Vance’s political career. Thiel is also a major figure in the “Thielverse,” a network that helped mainstream the ideas both men adopted.
Curtis Yarvin: A neo-reactionary philosopher whose ideas influenced both men. Vance has cited Yarvin’s work on dismantling “the Cathedral” (elite institutions like the media and academia), while Yarvin has spoken at Turning Point USA events and publicly analyzed the causes of Kirk’s assassination in late 2025.
Donald Trump Jr.: Kirk was the direct link between Vance and the Trump family. In 2021, Kirk used his influence to introduce Vance to Donald Trump Jr., which was essential in converting Vance from a “Never-Trump” critic into a vetted MAGA loyalist.
Individual Influences on Their Shifts
J.D. Vance:
Post-Liberal Philosophers: Vance cites Patrick Deneen (who advocates for a “post-liberal” order grounded in religious values) and Yoram Hazony (a key figure in Christian nationalism) as major intellectual influences.
Catholic Social Teaching: Vance’s conversion to Catholicism in 2019 provided a moral framework for his shift toward more nationalist and populist economic policies.
Charlie Kirk:
Blake Neff: Kirk’s producer, a former writer for Tucker Carlson, was a central influence on Kirk’s sudden reversal on Martin Luther King Jr.. Neff reportedly put together the 2024 podcast series “The Myth of MLK” that attacked King’s character and legacy.
Christopher Caldwell: Kirk’s view of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as a “huge mistake” was heavily influenced by Caldwell’s book The Age of Entitlement, which argues the Act created a “rival constitution” that undermined the original.
The Role of Kirk himself
Ironically, Charlie Kirk was one of the most significant influences on J.D. Vance’s shift. Vance credited Kirk as a “true friend” who guided his career, introducing him to campaign staff and donors, and acting as a primary advocate for Vance to become the 2024 Vice Presidential nominee. Following Kirk’s death in 2025, Vance has acted as the primary successor to Kirk’s media platform, using it to push the movement toward even harder-line policies.”
What was Vance’s life like before Kirk?
GoogleAI Mode: “Before his entry into national politics and his association with Charlie Kirk, J.D. Vance followed a trajectory from a “hardscrabble” Appalachian upbringing to the heights of the Ivy League and Silicon Valley.
Early Life and Family
Upbringing: Born James Donald Bowman in Middletown, Ohio, he grew up in a Rust Belt community with deep Appalachian roots.
Family Instability: His parents divorced when he was a toddler. His mother, Beverly, struggled with lifelong drug and alcohol addiction and was married five times.
Grandparents: He was primarily raised by his maternal grandparents, James (“Papaw”) and Bonnie (“Mamaw”) Vance. He has credited his grandmother’s “tough love” and discipline—she famously owned 19 handguns—for keeping him on a productive path.
Military and Education
Marine Corps: After high school in 2003, Vance enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps. He served four years as a combat correspondent (military journalist), including a deployment to Iraq in 2005 during Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Academic Path: He used the G.I. Bill to attend The Ohio State University, graduating summa cum laude in 2009. He then attended Yale Law School, where he served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal and graduated in 2013.
Professional Career
Venture Capital: Following a brief stint in corporate law, Vance moved to California to work in venture capital. He worked at Mithril Capital, a firm backed by billionaire Peter Thiel, and later founded his own firm, Narya Capital, in 2019.
Author: In 2016, he published his memoir, Hillbilly Elegy, which became a #1 New York Times bestseller. The book’s analysis of the white working class made him a national media sensation and “Trump-whisperer” for coastal elites trying to understand the 2016 election.
Relationship with Kirk
Vance and Kirk’s friendship began around 2017 after Kirk sent Vance a supportive direct message on Twitter following a television appearance. Before this connection, Vance was a vocal “Never Trump” conservative who famously compared Donald Trump to “America’s Hitler” in private and called him “reprehensible” in public. Kirk is credited with being the primary bridge that converted Vance into a MAGA loyalist, introducing him to Donald Trump Jr. and essential donors for his 2022 Senate run.”
How is Thiel a link between them? What is the link to the Republican Trifecta?
GoogleAI Mode: “Billionaire investor Peter Thiel acts as the primary financial and intellectual bridge between J.D. Vance and the late Charlie Kirk, serving as a cornerstone for the “New Right” movement that now dominates the 2025 Republican Trifecta (GOP control of the Presidency, House, and Senate).
Thiel as the Personal and Professional Link
Vance’s Patron: Thiel has been Vance’s primary benefactor for over a decade. Vance worked at Thiel’s investment firm, Mithril Capital, and Thiel provided $15 million in funding to launch Vance’s 2022 Senate campaign.
The Rockbridge Network: Vance and Thiel co-founded this donor network in 2019 to replace the “old guard” Republican establishment with a populist-nationalist alternative. Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA (TPUSA) became a primary vehicle for mobilizing the voters this network targeted.
Direct Introduction: Thiel personally introduced Vance to Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago, a meeting that eventually paved the way for Vance’s selection as Vice President. Kirk played a supporting role in this by using his media platform to lobby for Vance’s inclusion on the ticket.
The Link to the 2025 Republican Trifecta
With the Republican Party controlling all three branches of the federal government in 2025, Thiel’s influence has moved from the sidelines to the center of power:
Staffing the Administration: Thiel’s network is widely credited with staffing key positions within the Trump-Vance administration. His associates from various investment firms have been dispatched to agencies ranging from the Department of Commerce to the Pentagon.
Institutional Alignment: The trifecta represents the culmination of the strategy developed by the Rockbridge Network, which focuses on building a media and legal empire to ensure “eternal MAGA rule”.
Policy Shift: The trifecta has enabled the pursuit of a “post-liberal” agenda favored by Thiel and Vance—one that deprioritizes traditional libertarianism in favor of economic nationalism and an aggressive stance against “woke” corporate and academic institutions.
The “Martyrdom” Narrative: Following Kirk’s 2025 assassination, the trifecta has utilized his legacy to justify a series of aggressive purges of federal employees and political opponents, with Vance leading the charge to institutionalize Kirk’s “New Right” ideology.”
Essentially, the government is following one man’s ideas, Peter Thiel, not Donald J. Trump, through J. Donald B. AKA J.D. Vance?
GoogleAI Mode: “The 2025 administration is a synthesis of different “New Right” factions, with Peter Thiel’s ideas serving as an intellectual framework and J.D. Vance (born James Donald Bowman) acting as a key conduit for those ideas. Donald Trump remains the populist figurehead and ultimate decision-maker, not a passive figurehead following solely Thiel’s agenda.
J.D. Vance’s Role and Name
Legal Name: J.D. Vance was born James Donald Bowman. He later changed his middle name to David and adopted his stepfather’s surname, Hamel, before legally changing his last name to Vance in 2013 to honor his grandparents. His current legal name is James David Vance; the “J.D.” is a stylistic preference, not initials for “J. Donald B”.
Ideological Bridge: Vance acts as a crucial link between traditional Republican donors, the tech world, and the MAGA base. He is a primary defender of the “post-liberal” agenda that aligns with Thiel’s vision, particularly regarding economic nationalism and an aggressive stance against “woke” institutions.
The Influence Dynamic: Thiel vs. Trump
It is a coalition of influence, not the vision of one man alone:
Thiel’s Influence (Ideological and Financial): Thiel provides the intellectual and financial “seed capital” for the movement.
Staffing: His network has a pipeline of personnel, including allies like David Sacks, who are now staffing key positions in the administration.
Policy Focus: The administration’s focus on deregulation for the AI and crypto industries, and its efforts to dismantle federal agencies, align with Thiel’s long-held beliefs.
Trump’s Influence (Populist and Decisional): Donald Trump remains the president and ultimate power broker.
Agenda 47: While many of his appointees come from the Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025” blueprint, Trump has his own policy platform (“Agenda 47”) and style of governing that relies heavily on personal loyalty and populist appeal.
Figurehead: Trump is the driving force of the MAGA movement, and while he is influenced by those around him, the direction ultimately comes from him.
In short, Thiel provided the philosophical and financial backing for this political shift, and Vance is the primary implementer and messenger of those ideas in a conventional political sense. However, the final say and public direction of the government still rest with President Trump.”
Essentially, the government is following one man’s ideas, Peter Thiel, not Donald Trump, through J. Donald B?
GoogleAI Mode: “While billionaire Peter Thiel has been a pivotal mentor and financial benefactor for Vice President J. Donald Vance, the 2025 administration operates as an alliance of multiple powerful factions, rather than a government following only one man’s ideas.
The Role of Thiel’s Ideas
Intellectual Blueprint: Thiel’s long-standing critique of government “technological stagnation” and his 2009 vision for “slashing and burning” federal programs provide much of the intellectual foundation for current policies.
Techno-Nationalism: The administration has adopted Thiel’s “pro-innovation” stance, prioritizing cryptocurrency and AI development while deregulating the tech sector.
Personnel Pipeline: Many key 2025 appointments are Thiel protégés, including David Sacks (AI and Crypto Czar) and officials in the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Vance’s Relationship with Thiel
Patronage: Vance has explicitly stated that he owes his political rise to Thiel, who provided a record-breaking $15 million for his Senate run and personally introduced him to Donald Trump.
Independent Trajectory: Analysts note that while they are ideologically aligned, Vance has an intellectual life that predates Thiel. He is often viewed as the “heir apparent” who can institutionalize these ideas for a post-Trump era.
The Republican Trifecta as a Coalition
The 2025 government is a “new covenant” between several influential groups, not just Thiel:
Donald Trump: Remains the ultimate decision-maker and the emotional center of the movement, with his own focus on trade protectionism and immigration.
Elon Musk: Co-leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk brings his own “chopping-block zeal” to federal agencies.
The Rockbridge Network: A strategy group co-founded by Vance and Thiel that includes other conservative billionaires like Rebekah Mercer and media figures like Tucker Carlson, all aiming for “eternal MAGA rule”.
Charlie Kirk’s Legacy: Following Kirk’s September 10, 2025 assassination, his “New Right” cultural grievances have been integrated into the administration’s legal and social agenda.
In essence, Thiel provided the seed capital and the ideological framework, but the current government is a broader “MAGA movement” where his ideas compete and cooperate with those of Trump, Musk, and the populist base.”
On scale of 1 to 5, what is the likelihood that most Americans know about Thiel and his influence over our government?
GoogleAI Mode: “On a scale of 1 to 5, the likelihood that most Americans are aware of Peter Thiel’s specific influence over the government is a 2.
While Thiel is a high-profile figure within political and tech circles, his public recognition remains relatively low compared to mainstream political figures.
- Public Recognition of Peter Thiel
Fame and Popularity: As of mid-2025, surveys indicate that only about 46% of Americans are familiar with Peter Thiel. Of those who know him, many recognize him as a tech billionaire or the co-founder of PayPal rather than as a primary architect of current government policy.
Shadowy Perception: Unlike Elon Musk, who is highly visible and has a favorability rating known by the vast majority of the public, Thiel often operates “off stage,” leading many to view him as a “shadow” figure rather than a household name.
- Awareness of His Influence on J.D. Vance
Documented Ties: Media outlets and political analysts frequently highlight that J.D. Vance (born James Donald Bowman) was mentored by Thiel and that his political career was launched by a $15 million donation from him.
Niche Knowledge: Knowledge of the “Rockbridge Network”—the strategy group co-founded by Vance and Thiel to build a “post-Trump” MAGA movement—remains largely confined to those who follow political news closely.
- Public Sentiment on Tech Influence
General Distrust: There is a broad, high-level awareness that “tech CEOs” and “billionaires” have significant influence in the 2025 administration. Approximately 74% of Americans believe tech leaders have influence, with a majority viewing this as a negative development.
Focus on Musk vs. Thiel: Public concern regarding billionaire influence is overwhelmingly centered on Elon Musk, who is much more public about his role in the government (e.g., via the Department of Government Efficiency).
Summary Table of Awareness
Factor
Peter Thiel’s Name
Public Awareness Level
Moderate (~46%)
Key Detail
Primarily known as a tech investor.
Factor
Link to J.D. Vance
Public Awareness Level
Low to Moderate
Key Detail
Recognized mainly by political news consumers.
Factor
Thiel’s Policy Role
Public Awareness Level
Very Low
Key Detail
Specific influence over AI and crypto policy is niche knowledge.
Factor
Billionaire Influence
Public Awareness Level
High (~74%)
Key Detail
Most Americans suspect billionaire influence but focus on Elon Musk.”
What should the world know about Peter Thiel’s influence over the US government for 2026?
GoogleAI Mode: “In 2026, Peter Thiel’s influence over the U.S. government has evolved from that of a “shadowy” financier into a primary architect of a “post-liberal” political order. His power is institutionalized through a massive personnel network, high-stakes government contracts, and a deep intellectual alliance with the Vice President.
- Personnel: The “Thielist” Pipeline
By 2026, many of Thiel’s former employees and co-workers occupy influential roles across federal agencies. This “PayPal Mafia” presence ensures that policy aligns with Thiel’s techno-libertarian vision.
Vice President J.D. Vance: Thiel is credited with catapulting Vance into national politics with a record-breaking $15 million donation for his 2022 Senate run and introducing him to Trump.
David Sacks: A longtime Thiel collaborator, Sacks serves as the administration’s AI and Crypto Czar, driving deregulation of digital assets and AI development.
Federal Staffing: Protégés from Thiel’s investment firms now direct the Office of Science and Technology Policy and hold senior roles in Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Defense.
- Corporate Integration: Government as a Client
Thiel-backed companies have secured unprecedented access to federal data and defense spending, blurring the lines between private surveillance and public policy.
Palantir Technologies: Co-founded by Thiel, this data analytics giant has won billions in contracts for the Pentagon, CIA, and ICE. In 2025, it was integrated into a unified federal data-sharing system.
Anduril Industries: This Thiel-backed defense startup leads efforts in autonomous border surveillance and AI-driven military hardware.
General Matter: Thiel is a board member of this startup, which aims to privately enrich uranium, fitting his vision for a “new atomic age” of privately funded energy and defense.
- Ideological Vision: “The End of Democracy”
Thiel’s long-held beliefs are now being put into practice at a federal level. He has famously stated that “freedom and democracy are no longer compatible,” advocating instead for a system where tech CEOs and billionaires lead without “hostile” majority interference.
Gutting Federal Agencies: His “slashing and burning” of federal programs—first outlined in a 2009 essay—is the philosophical blueprint for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Elon Musk.
“Freedom Cities”: The administration has embraced Thiel’s idea for “Freedom Cities”—deregulated corporate zones where companies can conduct research without federal approval.
Crypto Sovereignty: His push for a “new world currency” free from government control is the driving force behind the administration’s aggressive pro-cryptocurrency stance.
- 2026 Political Strategy
Thiel is no longer staying “off-stage.” For the 2026 midterms, he is bankrolling a new slate of Republican candidates through the Rockbridge Network, focusing on shifting the party toward a populist-nationalist platform that outlasts the current presidency.”
On a scale of 1 to 5, what is the likelihood that most Americans have to deal with Peter Thiel’s ideology in 2026?
GoogleAI Mode: “On a scale of 1 to 5, the likelihood that most Americans will have to deal with Peter Thiel’s ideology in 2026 is a 4.5.
While Thiel himself remains a private figure, his ideology has become deeply institutionalized through a “New Right” network that controls the primary levers of federal power in 2025 and 2026.
Why the Rating is High (4.5)
The VP “Avatar”: Vice President J.D. Vance is widely described as an “avatar” for Thiel in the White House. Vance has called Thiel’s lectures the “most significant moment” of his education. His policy platform—from economic nationalism to “slashing and burning” federal agencies—directly mirrors Thiel’s long-standing “post-liberal” blueprints.
Personnel as Policy: Thiel’s network of protégés, often called the “Thielverse,” now staffs critical federal roles:
David Sacks (Thiel’s longtime collaborator) is the AI and Crypto Czar, driving a deregulatory agenda for digital assets that Thiel has championed for decades.
Michael Kratsios (former Thiel Capital chief of staff) leads the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Jim O’Neill (former Thiel Foundation CEO) is the Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Thiel-linked operatives also occupy senior roles in the Department of Defense and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Infrastructure of Control: Every American is subject to the data systems and defense technologies built by Thiel-founded companies like Palantir and Anduril. These firms have multibillion-dollar contracts to manage everything from Pentagon strike targeting to HHS data management and ICE deportation databases.
Core Tenets Americans Will Encounter in 2026
Post-Liberalism: The administration is shifting away from traditional democratic guardrails toward a “CEO-style” executive branch, reflecting Thiel’s stated belief that “freedom and democracy are no longer compatible”.
Technological Supremacy: Policies prioritize AI and nuclear energy expansion with minimal regulatory friction, aiming to end “decades-long technological stagnation”.
The “Katechon” Concept: In late 2025, Thiel’s public “Antichrist lectures” influenced a new brand of Christian-nationalist policy that frames the U.S. government as a “restrainer” (katechon) against globalist apocalypse.
Why Not a 5?
The rating is not a 5 because Thiel’s influence still faces competition from other powerful figures, most notably Donald Trump and Elon Musk, who often prioritize populist optics or personal brand over Thiel’s specific “hard tech” ideological goals. Additionally, legal challenges and state-level resistance continue to act as a buffer against a total national implementation of Thielist doctrine.”
Essentially, there are three guys competing for control of the US?
GoogleAI Mode: “In 2025, the U.S. government is indeed a battleground for influence between several powerful men with competing visions. While they often collaborate, their primary goal is to reshape the American state according to their individual ideologies.
The Current Power Dynamics (Late 2025)
The “Shadow” Architect (Peter Thiel): Thiel operates “off-stage” but has institutionalized his power. His primary “win” is Vice President J.D. Vance, a long-term protégé who serves as his ideological surrogate in the White House. Thiel’s goal is “post-liberalism”—a government run like a tech company that bypasses traditional democratic gridlock to focus on “hard tech” (AI, nuclear energy, and space).
The “Erratic” Disruptor (Elon Musk): Musk’s influence is more public and personal. After spending over $250 million to help Trump win, he led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) through May 2025. However, his relationship with Trump soured by mid-2025 after public feuds over the federal budget. Musk has since launched the America Party, positioning himself as a direct political alternative to both major parties while focusing on deficit reduction.
The “Final Word” (Donald Trump): Trump remains the ultimate decision-maker, often playing these billionaires against each other. While he utilized Musk’s “chainsaw” for budget cuts and relies on Thiel’s personnel to staff his agencies, Trump has repeatedly asserted his dominance, notably clashing with Musk and removing Musk-allied nominees like the NASA administrator.
How They Compete for Control
Personnel Warfare: Thiel’s “PayPal Mafia” and “Thielverse” allies (like David Sacks, the AI and Crypto Czar) are deeply embedded in the federal bureaucracy, ensuring his “long-game” influence. Musk tried to match this by placing SpaceX and Tesla employees in DOGE, but many departed with him in May 2025.
Infrastructure of State: Thiel’s company Palantir has secured billions in contracts to manage the “brain” of the U.S. military and intelligence, while Musk’s SpaceX and Starlink control the “physical” infrastructure of communication and space. Both men use these private companies as leverage over government policy.
Ideological Succession: As 2025 ends, the competition has shifted toward the 2028 presidency. Thiel is backing Vance to institutionalize “Thielism” for the long term. Meanwhile, Musk has vacillated between attacking Vance and considering backing him to maintain a foothold in the future of the MAGA movement.
Summary of the “Big Three”
Leader
Donald Trump
Strategy
Populism & Personal
Current Status (Dec 2025)
President; maintains ultimate veto power over the billionaires.
Leader
J.D. Vance (Thiel)
Strategy
Institutional “Post-Liberalism”
Current Status (Dec 2025)
Vice President; embedding the “Thielverse” into federal agencies.
Leader
Elon Musk
Strategy
Chaotic “DOGE” Disruptions
Current Status (Dec 2025)
Out of office; leads his own political party to challenge the establishment.”
THE 12-YEAR SUCCESSION PLAN
What do they all agree on as far as their vision of America?
GoogleAI Mode: “In 2025, the vision shared by Donald Trump, J.D. Vance, Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk is often described as “Techno-Nationalism” or “Post-Liberalism.” While they have different personal motivations, they are aligned on several core pillars for the future of America:
- Dismantling the “Administrative State”
Common Goal: They all view the federal bureaucracy (the “Deep State”) as an unelected, sclerotic force that stifles innovation and opposes their agenda.
Action: This is being executed through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which aims to slash trillions in spending and eliminate thousands of federal jobs to “modernize” the government.
- Technological Sovereignty and Supremacy
Shared Vision: They agree that the U.S. must win the “tech race” against China, specifically in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and nuclear energy.
Action: The administration has launched the “Genesis Mission” to rebuild national technological sovereignty through AI and has prioritized the deregulation of advanced nuclear reactor technologies.
- Deregulation and “CEO-Style” Governance
Common Belief: They believe the country should be run with the efficiency and speed of a startup.
Deregulatory Focus: They prioritize removing “needless regulatory burdens” in sectors like cryptocurrency, commercial drones, and space exploration. Thiel, in particular, views unregulated technology as the only way to “change the world without getting approval”.
- Cultural Realignment and “Meritocracy”
Anti-DEI Agenda: All four are staunchly opposed to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which they view as “identity politics” that undermine meritocracy.
Institutional Purge: Trump has used executive orders to dismantle DEI offices across federal agencies and has encouraged private companies and universities to do the same.
- National Sovereignty and “America First”
Border Control: They are unified in their support for a “hardline” border policy, utilizing mass deportations and AI-driven surveillance to ensure “zero releases” at the border.
Protectionism: They favor an “America First” trade policy, which includes high tariffs (specifically targeting China, Canada, and Mexico) to force companies to “build here” and protect domestic industries.
- 12-Year Succession Plan
Long-Term Vision: Elon Musk and Peter Thiel have both publicly strategized for a “great 12-year span” that begins with Trump’s second term and continues through two consecutive J.D. Vance terms starting in 2029. This plan is intended to institutionalize their “New Right” ideology for the next decade.”
It’s early in the morning. Please, confirm that there are several billionaires controlling the US government with plans to keep control for 12 years?
GoogleAI Mode: “Yes, it is accurate that the current U.S. administration, in 2025 and 2026, is heavily influenced by a small circle of billionaires who have articulated a long-term plan for control. Critics frequently use terms like “oligarchy” or “techno-nationalism” to describe the situation.
Key Details
Direct Government Involvement: The Trump administration includes the wealthiest cabinet in U.S. history, with a collective net worth of over $450 billion (including figures like Elon Musk, who has an advisory role). Senator Bernie Sanders has argued that this concentration of wealth has led to a government “of billionaires, by billionaires, and for billionaires”.
The 12-Year Plan: Elon Musk publicly predicted the U.S. is at the start of a “great 12-year span” consisting of Donald Trump’s second term, followed by two consecutive presidential terms for Vice President J.D. Vance (in 2028 and 2032). This long-term vision is shared by other tech investors associated with the group.
Institutional Influence: Peter Thiel’s long-term influence is institutionalized through his deep mentorship of J.D. Vance and by staffing key federal roles with his former employees, who advocate for his “post-liberal” ideas and a “CEO-style” government.
Corporate Integration: Billionaire-led companies, such as Thiel’s Palantir and Musk’s SpaceX, hold billions in government contracts for critical defense and intelligence infrastructure, linking corporate interests directly to national security.
Conflicting Interests: The presence of so many billionaires in government has raised significant concerns about conflicts of interest, as their policies often directly benefit their own companies and financial holdings.”
What are the implications?
GoogleAI Mode: “The implications of several billionaires controlling the U.S. government—with a stated 12-year vision—are multifaceted, ranging from a fundamental restructuring of the federal government to a radical shift in how democracy and the economy function for everyday citizens.
- Shift from Democracy to “Oligarchy”
Critics and civil groups have warned that the extreme concentration of wealth in the hands of a few active cabinet members is moving the U.S. toward an oligarchy.
Wealthified Politics: The wealthiest 100 Americans donated nearly $1 billion to federal elections in 2024, with roughly 80% going to the Republican Party. This creates a system where policy is increasingly dictated by a small group of “wealthy ideologues” rather than the broader electorate.
The “Post-Liberal” Order: Peter Thiel has argued that “freedom and democracy are no longer compatible”. His influence, along with that of Vice President J.D. Vance, pushes for a “post-liberal” state that functions more like a private corporation than a representative democracy.
- Radical Reshaping of the Federal Government
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, is the primary vehicle for this transformation.
“Slash and Burn”: The goal is to cut $2 trillion—about one-third of the federal budget—and significantly reduce the “regulatory state”.
Mass Layoffs and Relocation: Tactics include large-scale firings, forcing federal workers back to the office five days a week to trigger voluntary resignations, and relocating entire agencies out of Washington D.C..
Weakening Checks and Balances: Proponents of “Project 2025” advocate for consolidating power in the presidency, which would allow the executive branch to bypass Congress, install political cronies throughout the government, and weaken independent public agencies.
- Economic and Social Impacts
Rising Inequality: While the administration has cut taxes for corporations and billionaires, critics argue these policies harm the middle class by gutting social programs like Title I education funding and SNAP benefits.
Fiscal Instability: Tax cuts for the wealthy are projected to increase the U.S. deficit by nearly $4 trillion over 10 years, potentially pushing the deficit-to-GDP ratio to more than 7% by 2026.
Techno-Nationalist Foreign Policy: The U.S. has pivoted to “techno-nationalism,” weaponizing trade and tariffs to assert digital dominance and punish foreign nations that regulate U.S. tech platforms.
- Direct Conflicts of Interest
The unprecedented involvement of billionaires in governing creates inherent conflicts of interest.
Corporate Capture: Concerns persist that leaders like Elon Musk may use their government influence to steer lucrative contracts toward their own firms, such as SpaceX.
Regulatory Escape: Private equity and tech billionaires are pushing for deregulation in sectors where they hold massive investments, such as AI, cryptocurrency, and defense tech, often at the expense of worker protections and environmental rules.
- The 12-Year Vision
The 12-year plan—consisting of a second Trump term followed by two terms for J.D. Vance—aims to institutionalize Trumpism for the long term.
Generational Shift: The plan seeks to ensure that even after Trump leaves office, his “New Right” ideology remains the dominant force in American life through 2036, effectively ending the traditional liberal international order.”
Is the 12 years to ensure the end of democracy in the United States?
GoogleAI Mode: “The 12-year vision described by proponents of the “New Right” is not framed by them as a plan to “end democracy,” but rather as a mandate to permanently restructure the American government. Critics, however, argue that this restructuring would effectively dismantle the democratic system as it has existed for over 250 years.
The Two Perspectives on the 12-Year Vision
- Proponents’ View: “Restoring Efficiency”
Billionaires like Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, along with Vice President J.D. Vance, frame this 12-year window (four years of Trump followed by eight of Vance) as a period to “fix” a broken system:
A “CEO-Style” Government: They advocate for running the country like a startup, prioritizing efficiency, technological supremacy (especially in AI and nuclear energy), and “hard tech” innovation over traditional bureaucratic processes.
The “Post-Liberal” Order: They believe that modern liberalism and the “administrative state” have become “unaccountable and mostly liberal” obstacles that must be dismantled to restore true national sovereignty.
“Eternal MAGA Rule”: Groups like the Rockbridge Network, co-founded by Vance and Thiel, aim to build a “conservative media ecosystem” and a legal strategy that ensures their coalition wins every election with roughly 55% of the popular vote for the next decade.
- Critics’ View: “Establishing Autocracy”
Legal experts, political analysts, and civil rights groups view this same 12-year vision as an “authoritarian playbook” intended to seize permanent power:
Dismantling Checks and Balances: Critics argue that initiatives like Project 2025 (which Vance has praised) seek to give the President unprecedented control, allowing for the firing of thousands of career civil servants and the end of the independence of the DOJ and FBI.
Eroding the Franchise: Critics point to Thiel’s stated belief that “freedom and democracy are no longer compatible” as evidence that the long-term goal is to move the U.S. toward an autocratic or “post-democratic” system where tech elites, not the “unthinking demos” (voters), steer the nation.
Permanent Control: By radical redrawing of congressional districts, the potential use of the National Guard and ICE for “intimidation,” and the creation of a “state-run media network” with billionaire help, the plan is seen as a deliberate effort to ensure the current administration and its allies remain in power regardless of public opinion.
Current Status in Late 2025
The “Broligarchy” Influence: As of late 2025, several architects of Project 2025 have been nominated to key administration roles.
Legislative Milestones: Vice President Vance recently cast a tiebreaking vote on a major budget reconciliation bill, which supporters call a victory for their “America First” vision and critics label a “betrayal of working families”.
2028 Succession: Turning Point USA (TPUSA) has already officially endorsed J.D. Vance for President in 2028, signaling that the effort to secure a 12-year span of control is already well underway.”
THE KEY PEOPLE
Who are the key people in place to make this change?
GoogleAI Mode: “The plan to permanently restructure the U.S. government is being implemented by a network of highly loyal allies, a group often referred to as the “PayPal Mafia” and the architects of the conservative blueprint Project 2025.
The Political Architects
Donald Trump: The President and ultimate decision-maker of the movement. He has the final say on all appointments and policies and uses his populist appeal to drive public support.
J.D. Vance: The Vice President and Peter Thiel’s primary protégé in government. Vance is the intellectual and political bridge between the tech billionaires and the Trump base, positioning himself for a presidential run in 2028 and beyond.
Peter Thiel: The billionaire who remains outside of a formal government role but acts as a key adviser and financial benefactor. His network of former employees is embedded across agencies, implementing his “post-liberal” and anti-regulation agenda.
Stephen Miller: Trump’s former and current adviser, known for his hardline immigration policies. Miller leads America First Legal, which is an advisory organization for Project 2025 and is deeply involved in vetting and placing loyalist staff across the government.
Russell Vought: The Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and a key author of Project 2025. Vought is a primary driver of the plan to use the OMB to “bring the bureaucracy in line” with presidential decisions and implement large-scale workforce reductions.
Elon Musk: Initially co-led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to “slash and burn” federal waste. Though he has publicly left the position, many of his suggested cuts and ideas for “mass head-count reductions” are still being pursued by other staff.
Vivek Ramaswamy: Initially co-led DOGE with Musk before withdrawing in early 2025 to pursue a run for Ohio Governor in 2026. He helped frame the initial “chainsaw” approach to federal bureaucracy.
The Network of Staffers (The “Thielverse”)
A network of individuals with direct ties to Peter Thiel’s companies and investments now holds key positions:
David Sacks: The long-time Thiel associate who serves as the White House’s AI and Crypto Czar, driving a policy of minimal regulation for the tech industry.
Michael Kratsios: A former Thiel Capital chief of staff, he is now the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
Jim O’Neill: The former CEO of the Thiel Foundation, he has been nominated as the Deputy Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Clark Minor: A former Palantir software engineer, he is the Chief Information Officer at the HHS, overseeing the agency’s data systems.
Jacob Helberg: An adviser to Palantir, he is the Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment, where he advocates for tech interests in foreign policy.
Tom Homan: The “border czar” and former immigration chief, he is responsible for implementing the administration’s hardline immigration agenda, a core pillar of the “America First” movement.”
Who are the key people in place to make this change?
GoogleAI Mode: “You are asking about a 12-year plan to restructure the American government and the people involved. Information about a long-term plan to restructure the government involving specific individuals is not available.”
Who is in place to ensure the 12-year plan?
GoogleAI Mode: “The 12-year vision to permanently restructure the U.S. government is managed by an alliance of billionaires, administration officials, and “New Right” think tank leaders who have been strategically placed in key positions:
Billionaire Architects (The “Thielverse” & Allies)
These individuals provide the intellectual and financial capital but do not hold official government positions themselves.
Peter Thiel: The mastermind behind much of the “post-liberal” ideology. He bankrolled J.D. Vance’s career and positioned his network of former employees and associates (the “PayPal Mafia”) throughout various agencies to implement his long-term vision.
Elon Musk: While his official role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been erratic, he remains a key figure in the “techno-nationalist” movement, using his companies (SpaceX, X) as powerful leverage and advocating for a permanent Republican majority.
Administration Officials
These individuals hold official power and are actively implementing the policies described in the “Project 2025” blueprint.
J.D. Vance (Vice President): The central political figure in the plan for succession. He is the intellectual “avatar” for Peter Thiel and has been publicly endorsed by the grassroots MAGA movement for the 2028 and 2032 presidential elections.
Russell Vought (Director of the Office of Management and Budget): A self-described Christian nationalist who is a primary author and a key figure in implementing the “Project 2025” playbook for dismantling the administrative state. He is reportedly drafting hundreds of executive orders to lay the groundwork for rapid action.
Stephen Miller (Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy): A long-time immigration hardliner who advocates for weakening checks and balances and expanding presidential power. He has pledged to use the Department of Justice to target political opponents and “left-wing networks”.
David Sacks (AI and Crypto Czar): A close associate of Peter Thiel, Sacks is in a crucial position to deregulate artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, a core part of the “Thielist” vision for technological dominance.
Michael Kratsios (Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy): A former employee of Thiel Capital, he ensures that the government’s science and tech policies align with the “America First” agenda.
Tom Homan (White House Border Czar): The former ICE director is a hardline immigration advocate implementing the mass deportation and “zero release” border policies outlined in Project 2025.
Supporting Network
Erika Kirk (CEO, Turning Point USA): The widow of Charlie Kirk, she has taken the helm of the influential youth organization and formally endorsed J.D. Vance for president in 2028, ensuring grassroots mobilization for the long-term plan.
The Heritage Foundation and America First Legal: These conservative think tanks are the operational core of the plan, developing the legal and policy frameworks for the power consolidation.”
World Peace 
Leave a comment