World Peace

TPUSA

What is significant about TPUSA endorsing Vance as the next president?

GoogleAI Mode: “In December 2025, Turning Point USA (TPUSA) CEO Erika Kirk officially endorsed Vice President JD Vance as the next president for the 2028 election cycle. This move is significant for several key reasons: 

Early Consolidation of the MAGA Base: The endorsement, occurring nearly three years before the 2028 election, signals an early effort to unify the “Make America Great Again” coalition behind a single successor to Donald Trump.

Dominant Grassroots Support: Alongside the endorsement, Vance won the TPUSA 2028 straw poll with a record-breaking 84.2% of the vote, far outpacing potential rivals like Marco Rubio (4.8%) and Ron DeSantis (2.9%).

Mobilization of Infrastructure: TPUSA has already begun deploying its nationwide grassroots machine to support Vance, including building staff and operations in key early primary states like Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada.

Legacy of Charlie Kirk: The endorsement carries heavy emotional and symbolic weight within the movement as Erika Kirk, the widow of late TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk, positioned Vance as the person to continue her husband’s mission following his assassination in September 2025.

Anointed “Heir Apparent”: While Vance has not yet officially declared his candidacy, the endorsement from such a prominent youth-focused organization marks him as the clear frontrunner and “heir apparent” to the MAGA movement. 

Vance has expressed gratitude for the support but stated he remains focused on the 2026 midterms before making a formal decision about a 2028 run.”

From the perspective of the 12-year plan to restructure the US government, is it clear Vance will run for president?

GoogleAI Mode: “JD Vance has not officially announced his intention to run for president in 2028, but the recent endorsement from Turning Point USA (TPUSA) CEO Erika Kirk, the massive straw poll win at AmericaFest, and other significant support indicate a highly likely bid. Within the context of the “12-year span” prediction by Elon Musk, Vance is viewed as a clear “heir apparent” to continue the Trump administration’s agenda. 

“12-Year Plan” & Vance’s Role

The “12-year plan to restructure the US government” is a phrase primarily associated with a prediction made by tech billionaire Elon Musk. He projected a “great 12-year span” composed of the current Donald Trump administration followed by two consecutive JD Vance presidential terms. This idea suggests a long-term conservative vision for the executive branch and federal bureaucracy, often linked to the policy proposals outlined in the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. 

While the “plan” itself is an informal term used by commentators and supporters like Musk, Vance’s actions and support within the conservative movement align with this long-term view: 

Key Endorsements: In addition to TPUSA, prominent conservative figures like Tucker Carlson have decisively backed Vance, claiming he is the “only person… capable of carrying on the Trump legacy”.

Widespread Polling Lead: Vance currently leads other potential 2028 Republican contenders by wide margins in various polls and is a favorite in betting markets, suggesting strong grassroots and donor confidence in his candidacy.

Strategic Positioning: TPUSA is actively deploying its infrastructure and mobilizing support for Vance in key early primary states well in advance of the election, aiming to consolidate the MAGA base early.

Vance’s Stance

Despite the strong external support and high expectations, Vance has remained publicly cautious, stating he wants to focus on his current role as Vice President and the 2026 midterms. He has indicated he will discuss his future plans with President Trump after the midterms, but most political observers and allies widely expect him to seek the nomination and view his candidacy as almost certain.”

What’s the significance of TPUSA backing Vance so early?

GoogleAI Mode: “The early endorsement of Vice President JD Vance by Turning Point USA (TPUSA) CEO Erika Kirk in December 2025 is a major strategic development for the 2028 election cycle. Its significance lies in consolidating the “MAGA” base nearly three years ahead of the vote and signaling a clear successor to Donald Trump. 

1. Consolidating the “Heir Apparent”

Defining the Field Early: By backing Vance now, TPUSA aims to clear the Republican field, sending a “warning shot” to other potential 2028 contenders like Ron DeSantis.

Straw Poll Dominance: Vance’s massive win in the TPUSA straw poll with 84.2% of the vote—a larger margin than Donald Trump received in previous polls—underscores his position as the movement’s undisputed leader.

Strategic Deference: The endorsement has already prompted potential rivals to signal their support; Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated he would defer to Vance if he runs. 

2. Immediate Deployment of “The Machine”

Grassroots Infrastructure: TPUSA is not just offering a verbal nod but is already deploying its nationwide grassroots machine. This includes building staff and opening offices in critical early primary states like Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada.

Youth Mobilization: As a millennial leader, Vance is positioned as a natural fit for TPUSA’s core mission of mobilizing Gen Z and millennial voters, providing him with an established army of thousands of volunteers. 

3. Symbolic and Legacy Weight

Carrying the Mantle: Erika Kirk, the widow of late TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk, framed the endorsement as fulfilling her husband’s final wish following his assassination in September 2025. This adds emotional and moral authority to Vance’s candidacy within the movement.

Vowing for “48”: Kirk explicitly stated her commitment to getting Vance elected as the 48th President, emphasizing a long-term vision to extend the current administration’s influence for a total of 12 years. 

4. Navigating Internal Rifts

Unifying a Fractured Movement: The endorsement comes amidst public infighting at events like AmericaFest. By backing Vance, TPUSA seeks to stabilize the movement and settle policy disputes early to focus on the 2028 general election well ahead of schedule.”

Potential 2028 Candidates

Who are other key figures in this potential conservative long-term plan?

GoogleAI Mode: “The conservative long-term vision, often linked to the informal “12-year plan” prediction and policy blueprints like Project 2025, involves several influential figures beyond JD Vance. These individuals are a mix of current administration officials, conservative think tank leaders, media personalities, and other potential 2028 presidential contenders. 

Potential 2028 Candidates

Besides JD Vance, several other high-profile Republicans are considered potential candidates or influential voices in shaping the party’s future direction:

Marco Rubio: The current Secretary of State is often mentioned by President Trump as a potential running mate or successor and holds significant influence within the administration.

Ron DeSantis: The Governor of Florida, despite a previous failed 2024 presidential run, remains a prominent conservative voice and a potential 2028 candidate with his own political infrastructure.

Donald Trump Jr.: President Trump’s eldest son is an influential adviser and confidant within the MAGA movement, with many speculating he may seek the presidency in 2028 to continue his father’s legacy.

Ted Cruz: The Texas Senator, a strong conservative and former presidential candidate himself, has kept a high national profile and has not ruled out another run.

Kristi Noem: Serving as Secretary of Homeland Security, she is responsible for implementing the administration’s mass deportation agenda and is another figure considered a potential future candidate.

Glenn Youngkin: The Governor of Virginia is seen as a potential post-Trump option, having won in a typically blue-leaning state, which gives him a unique appeal. 

Architects of Policy and Government Restructuring

Key figures involved in developing and implementing the policy goals associated with the long-term conservative vision include:

Elon Musk: The tech billionaire led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) commission, an advisory body tasked with identifying cost-cutting measures and streamlining federal operations.

Russ Vought: As a key architect of Project 2025 and former Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Vought is a leading figure in the effort to “dismantle the administrative state” through policies like reinstating “Schedule F”.

Stephen Miller: A former top adviser to President Trump, Miller remains influential and is involved with America First Legal, a group on Project 2025’s advisory board, focusing on policy implementation.

Vivek Ramaswamy: The entrepreneur co-chaired the DOGE commission with Elon Musk before stepping aside to pursue other endeavors.

Erika Kirk: As the CEO of Turning Point USA, she controls a powerful grassroots and youth mobilization machine that is expected to play a crucial role in the 2028 election cycle.”

Erika Kirk

Why is Erika Kirk significant in the plan?

GoogleAI Mode: “Erika Kirk is significant in the potential conservative long-term plan primarily as the leader of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), a major force in Republican youth outreach and grassroots mobilization. Her significance lies in two main areas: 

Strategic Influence and Endorsement

Controlling a Grassroots Machine: As the CEO and Chair of the Board, she controls TPUSA’s nationwide network of over a million students and chapters on college campuses, which is crucial for building momentum in early primary states.

Anointing the “Heir Apparent”: Her recent, early endorsement of Vice President JD Vance as the next president carries significant weight within the MAGA movement. By positioning Vance as the one to continue her late husband Charlie Kirk’s mission, she helps consolidate the conservative base behind a single candidate, fulfilling a key part of the long-term vision to maintain the presidency for 12 years.

Mobilizing for 2028: TPUSA is already actively deploying staff and operations in key early primary states like Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada to support Vance’s likely bid, demonstrating a concrete commitment to the “plan”. 

Symbolic and Cultural Leadership

Steward of a Legacy: After her husband’s assassination in September 2025, Erika Kirk took the helm as per his wishes, becoming a powerful symbol and “mother figure” within the movement. She has vowed to make TPUSA even stronger and continue its mission to engage young people with conservative and Christian beliefs.

Reaching Women Voters: Kirk, an entrepreneur and advocate for traditional family values, is seen by Republican strategists as a potential conduit to narrow the persistent gender divide among young voters, bringing more young women into the party fold.

Faith-Based Messaging: Through her leadership role and other projects like the BIBLEin365 ministry, she reinforces the Christian nationalist themes prevalent in the movement, appealing to a core segment of the conservative base.”

PROJECT 2025

What policy changes are associated with JD Vance and Project 2025?

GoogleAI Mode: “Vice President JD Vance’s policy agenda in 2025 is closely aligned with the core pillars of Project 2025, a roadmap designed by the Heritage Foundation to restructure the federal government. While Vance has occasionally distanced himself from the project’s specific branding, his public statements and the administration’s early 2025 actions reflect a deep commitment to its primary goals. 

Key Policy Alignments in 2025

Dismantling the “Administrative State”: Vance is a primary advocate for Schedule F, a plan to reclassify thousands of career civil servants as political appointees to make them easier to fire and replace with loyalists. He has previously called for firing “every single mid-level bureaucrat” in the federal government.

Abolishing Federal Agencies: The administration has moved toward the Project 2025 goal of eliminating the Department of Education. Linda McMahon, the Education Secretary, has been tasked with facilitating its closure. Efforts are also underway to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

Consolidating Executive Power: Aligned with the project’s “unitary executive theory,” Vance supports placing independent agencies, including the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI, under direct presidential control to streamline policy implementation.

Abortion and Reproductive Health: Vance has supported using the Comstock Act to crack down on mail-order abortion pills, a key Project 2025 objective. In late 2025, the administration also moved to freeze federal family-planning funds for organizations like Planned Parenthood.

Education and Social Programs: The administration’s 2025 education focus includes eliminating the Head Start program and ending Public Service Loan Forgiveness, both of which were outlined in Project 2025.

Economic and Tax Reforms: Early 2025 actions mirror project goals to lower corporate taxes (targeting an 18% rate) and eventually transition from income taxes to a national sales tax through aggressive import tariffs. 

Deep Ties to Project Architects 

Vance’s connection to Project 2025 is reinforced by his relationship with its authors. He wrote the foreword for Dawn’s Early Light, a book by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, the architect of Project 2025, calling the foundation the “most influential engine of ideas for Republicans”. Additionally, Russell Vought, a primary author of the project, has maintained regular contact with Vance’s office and now leads the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).”

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

What policy goals of Project 2025 are most controversial?

GoogleAI Mode: “Project 2025’s most controversial policy goals involve a radical restructuring of the federal government and a significant shift in social, environmental, and economic policies. Critics often describe these as “authoritarian” or “Christian nationalist” in nature. 

1. Radical Restructuring of Government

Politicizing the Civil Service: The plan aims to reinstate “Schedule F,” an executive order that would reclassify tens of thousands of nonpartisan career civil servants as political appointees, making it easier to fire and replace them with loyalists.

Unitary Executive Theory: Project 2025 promotes an expansive interpretation of presidential power, placing independent agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI under direct White House control to carry out the president’s agenda.

Abolishing Federal Agencies: The document explicitly calls for the complete elimination of the Department of Education and the dismantling of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and NOAA. 

2. Social and Reproductive Rights

Restricting Abortion Access: While it does not call for an outright national ban, it advocates for the DOJ to enforce the 1873 Comstock Act to criminalize the mailing of abortion pills and supplies. It also calls for revoking FDA approval of mifepristone.

LGBTQ+ Rights: The plan proposes reversing federal nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ individuals and effectively banning transgender people from military service. It equates “transgender ideology” to pornography and suggests it should be outlawed.

Biblical Family Definition: It encourages federal agencies to adopt a “biblically based” definition of marriage as being exclusively between one man and one woman. 

3. Immigration and Enforcement

Mass Deportations: The blueprint supports the “largest deportation program in American history,” including using active-duty military personnel to assist in arrest operations.

Ending Birthright Citizenship: It proposes ending the long-standing practice of granting citizenship to children born on U.S. soil. 

4. Climate and Economy

Shredding Climate Protections: The plan advocates for eliminating climate change references from all federal rules and agency websites, withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement, and dismantling the EPA’s climate departments to prioritize fossil fuel production.

Social Safety Net Cuts: It proposes significant changes to SNAP (food stamps), including stricter work requirements that could result in millions of people losing benefits, and suggests moving toward a flat income tax which could increase the tax burden on middle-class families.”

Considering international human rights law, what are the apparent violations of Project 2025?

GoogleAI Mode: “Project 2025 has been identified by various international human rights organizations and experts as containing proposals that would potentially violate established international human rights laws and norms. These concerns primarily revolve around the right to health, nondiscrimination, asylum, and the rule of law. 

1. Reproductive Rights and the Right to Health

Project 2025’s focus on restricting abortion and contraception is seen as a violation of the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, as recognized in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). 

Access to Safe Abortion: Proposing a nationwide ban on medication abortion and criminalizing providers directly conflicts with international standards that view safe abortion as essential healthcare.

Global Gag Rule: Reinstating and expanding this rule (done in January 2025) violates international norms by blocking funding for organizations that provide or even mention abortion services, leading to preventable maternal deaths globally.

Geneva Consensus Declaration: Project 2025 supports this non-binding declaration, which claims there is no international right to abortion, a stance UN experts state undermines decades of established human rights principles. 

2. Discrimination Against LGBTQ+ Individuals

Proposals to narrow the definition of sex discrimination and remove federal protections for LGBTQ+ people are viewed as violations of the right to equality and nondiscrimination. 

Erasure of Identity: Efforts to delete terms like “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” from federal regulations and laws exclude these populations from legal protections.

Criminalizing Trans Identity: Equating transgender identity to “pornography” and seeking to outlaw it in public life would violate rights to freedom of expression and privacy.

Military and Passport Restrictions: Banning transgender individuals from military service and removing “X” gender markers on passports (actions already taken in 2025) are seen as discriminatory under international law. 

3. Migrant and Refugee Rights

The plan’s approach to immigration is criticized for potentially violating the principle of non-refoulement and the right to seek asylum under the 1951 Refugee Convention. 

Asylum Restrictions: Eliminating “membership in a particular social group” as a ground for asylum would leave victims of gender-based persecution (like domestic violence) with no legal path to safety.

Mass Deportations and Detention: The goal of the “largest deportation program in American history” and increased detention resources may lead to violations of due process and the right to liberty and security of person. 

4. Rule of Law and Democratic Oversight

UN human rights experts have expressed “grave concern” that Project 2025’s proposed restructuring of the government strikes at the heart of the international rule of law. 

Schedule F and Politicization: Reclassifying career civil servants as political appointees (Schedule F) is viewed as an attempt to evade accountability for human rights violations by ensuring personal and political loyalty over nonpartisan service.

Withdrawal from International Bodies: Withdrawing from the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNESCO (as seen in early 2025) undermines multilateral cooperation on global health and human rights.”

PROJECT 2025 IMPLICATIONS

What are the implications if Project 2025 is successful using the 12-year plan for America, Americans and the world?

GoogleAI Mode: “The successful implementation of Project 2025 within the projected “12-year span” (encompassing the current Trump administration followed by a potential two-term Vance presidency) would fundamentally restructure the United States’ government, economy, and global standing.

Implications for America and the Government

End of Nonpartisan Civil Service: The cornerstone of the plan is “Schedule F,” which reclassifies tens of thousands of career civil servants as political appointees. Over 12 years, this would replace the merit-based system with one rooted in political fealty, potentially removing a million federal jobs through privatization and cuts.

Consolidation of Executive Power: By placing independent agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI under direct presidential control, the administration could use federal resources to investigate political opponents and bypass Congressional oversight.

Dismantling Federal Agencies: The plan targets the permanent elimination of the Department of Education, NOAA, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), shifting their responsibilities to states or the private sector.

Implications for Americans

Economic Shifts and Higher Costs: Proposals include collapsing seven tax brackets into two (15% and 30%), which would cut taxes for the wealthy while nearly tripling them for some families earning under $100,000. Over 12 years, the elimination of student loan forgiveness and overtime pay protections could significantly increase the financial burden on the middle class.

Healthcare and Social Safety Nets: Medicaid would likely face lifetime enrollment caps and strict work requirements, potentially causing 20% of current enrollees to lose coverage. The plan also seeks to privatize significant portions of the VA and Medicare.

Restricted Personal Freedoms: A successful 12-year agenda would prioritize “biblically based” family definitions, potentially reversing LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination laws and implementing nationwide bans on medication abortion through the Comstock Act. 

Implications for the World

Isolationism and Transactional Diplomacy: The plan reorients foreign policy toward a “Black Friday” transactional model, focusing almost exclusively on China as a threat while treating traditional alliances in Europe and the Middle East as afterthoughts.

Weakened Alliances: Project 2025 advocates for “transforming” NATO by handing lead responsibility for Russian deterrence to European allies, signaling to the world that U.S. political and military commitments are no longer guaranteed.

Climate and Global Health Retreat: By withdrawing from the Paris Agreement and the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. would relinquish its leadership in global health and climate action. Enacting these policies could increase global carbon emissions by billions of tons by 2030.”

SOLUTIONS

What are the solutions?

GoogleAI Mode: “Solutions to counter the policy goals of Project 2025 primarily involve a multi-pronged approach combining legal action, legislative efforts, and extensive grassroots mobilization by various civil rights and advocacy organizations.

Legal and Legislative Solutions

Legal Challenges: A coalition of hundreds of lawyers from different organizations is actively preparing for “swift and robust legal opposition” to challenge the most controversial policies in court, particularly the implementation of Schedule F and other actions deemed unlawful or unconstitutional.

Congressional Oversight: Opposition strategies involve working with members of Congress to use their constitutional powers to provide oversight, investigate executive branch wrongdoing, and defund policies that threaten fundamental rights. The “Saving the Civil Service Act” has been introduced in Congress to specifically prohibit the implementation of Schedule F.

State-Level Protections: Advocacy groups are urging state lawmakers and attorneys general to enact proactive laws that protect residents from federal overreach and interference. This includes passing legislation to prohibit the use of state resources to support certain federal enforcement measures, such as those targeting abortion access or transgender rights.

Grassroots and Public Awareness Solutions

Public Education: A primary strategy is raising public awareness about the potential harms and specific policy impacts of Project 2025. This is done through public forums, media, educational initiatives, and shareable content to mobilize a “national backlash”.

Community Organizing: Organizations like the ACLU and the National Urban League are organizing within communities to educate people about their rights, provide direct support to those most impacted, and build coalitions to counter the agenda.

Voter Mobilization: A key solution emphasized by many advocacy groups is ensuring high voter registration and turnout in all elections to elect officials at federal, state, and local levels who oppose the Project 2025 agenda.

Institutional and Corporate Resistance: Efforts are being made to encourage institutions, corporations, and universities to resist intimidation tactics and double down on their commitments to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) and equal opportunity programs. 

International Engagement

International Partnerships: For areas like education and climate research, scholars and advocates are encouraged to seek more partnerships with international institutions to continue their work and research on a global scale, outside the potential constraints of federal funding cuts.

Global Climate Action: Opponents argue for the next administration to build on existing climate agreements, restore U.S.-China climate diplomacy, and meet climate finance commitments to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, contrasting sharply with Project 2025’s focus on fossil fuels.”

Has Project 2025 been implemented?

GoogleAI Mode: “As of late December 2025, a significant portion of the Project 2025 agenda has been implemented or is currently in progress. Reports from various policy trackers indicate that approximately 40% to 50% of its stated objectives have been addressed through executive actions during the first year of the second Trump administration. 

While President Trump previously sought to distance himself from the document, his 2025 administration has aggressively pursued its core pillars, particularly in restructuring the federal workforce and reducing the scale of the “administrative state”. 

Key Areas of Implementation in 2025

Federal Workforce Restructuring:

Schedule F (Policy/Career): Reinstated via executive order on January 20, 2025. This creates a new category of “at-will” federal employees, stripping civil service protections from an estimated 50,000 career positions to ensure they are responsive to presidential directives.

DOGE Operations: The Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, has initiated mass layoffs and hiring freezes, aligning with Project 2025’s goal of shrinking the federal bureaucracy.

Dismantling the Department of Education:

Closure Efforts: An executive order issued on March 20, 2025, directed Secretary Linda McMahon to facilitate the department’s closure.

Staff Reductions: The administration has successfully cut the department’s workforce by approximately 50% following a Supreme Court ruling in July that allowed mass layoffs to proceed.

Interagency Transfers: Seven major interagency agreements were signed to move specific offices—such as student loans and special needs programs—to other departments like the Small Business Administration and HHS.

Reproductive and LGBTQ+ Rights:

Policy Shifts: Roughly 40% of Project 2025’s goals regarding reproductive freedom have been enacted, including revoking guidance on emergency abortion care and cutting federal funding for organizations like Planned Parenthood.

Transgender Protections: Protections for transgender service members were reversed in early 2025, and gender-neutral “X” markers on passports were eliminated.

International Agreements:

The administration formally withdrew the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Paris Climate Agreement in early 2025. 

Current Status of the Remaining Agenda

While executive actions have enabled rapid progress, major legislative shifts—such as permanently codifying tax changes or eliminating large entitlement programs like Medicaid—face challenges in Congress and are frequently subject to ongoing litigation in federal courts.”

2028 CANDIDATES OPPOSING PROJECT 2025

Who are the candidates in opposition to Project 2025?

GoogleAI Mode: “In 2025, opposition to Project 2025 and its long-term implementation plan (the “12-year plan”) comes from a diverse field of Democratic contenders for 2028, as well as a small group of Republican dissenters.

Democratic Presidential Contenders (2028)

Leading Democratic figures have positioned themselves as the primary “counter” to the JD Vance and Project 2025 agenda. Key names mentioned as 2028 frontrunners include: 

Pete Buttigieg & Gavin Newsom: Currently leading early Democratic favorability polls for 2028. Newsom has actively campaigned against the administration’s 2025 policies, specifically targeting their impact on state affordability and civil rights.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC): A prominent progressive voice who has explicitly stated she would “stomp” Vance in a hypothetical 2028 matchup. She is viewed as a favorite by some analysts to lead the ideological zeal needed to counter the MAGA movement.

Kamala Harris: While her standing has fluctuated, the former Vice President remains a central figure in the opposition.

Josh Shapiro & Gretchen Whitmer: Viewed as “moderate” alternatives who could perform well against a MAGA candidate in the general election by appealing to Rust Belt voters.

JB Pritzker: The Illinois Governor has used his personal wealth to fund ballot measures for abortion access, explicitly countering the Project 2025 goal of restricting reproductive rights.

Raphael Warnock & Wes Moore: Rising stars within the party who have criticized the current administration for creating national division. 

Republican Opposition

Within the GOP, opposition is less about the project’s broad goals and more about specific policies or internal power struggles against JD Vance:

Rand Paul: The Kentucky Senator has signaled he would not back Vance for 2028, citing opposition to the administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” tariffs, and trade policies.

Ted Cruz: Reports indicate Cruz is considering a 2028 run to challenge Vance, positioning himself against what he calls Vance’s “dangerously isolationist” views.

Thomas Massie: Some libertarian-leaning Republicans hope the Kentucky Representative will run as a GOP alternative to Vance. 

Organized Advocacy and Tasks Forces

Project FREEDOM: A coalition of Black leaders launched this counter-initiative to provide a precise policy contrast to Project 2025 ahead of future elections.

Congressional Task Force: House Democrats, led by Jared Huffman, established a formal task force to stop the implementation of the project’s goals, which they describe as a path toward a “right-wing theocracy”.”