World Peace

THE PARTIES DEFINED

According to the Qur’an, Bible and Torah (exclude Hadith), who is the Party of the Left & Party of the Right?

GoogleAI Mode: “In the Qur’an and Bible, the “Party of the Right” and “Party of the Left” represent the eternal destinations of souls based on their faith and deeds. While the Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible) rarely focuses on the afterlife, it establishes the symbolic foundation that the right represents blessing and the left represents lesser favor. 

The Qur’an

In the Qur’an (specifically Surah Al-Waqi’ah, Chapter 56), humanity is divided into three distinct groups on the Day of Judgment: 

The Companions of the Right (Ashab al-Maymanah): These are the righteous believers who will receive their “Book of Deeds” in their right hands. They are rewarded with the Gardens of Bliss, flowing water, and abundant fruits.

The Companions of the Left (Ashab al-Mash’amah): These are the disbelievers and persistent sinners who receive their record in their left hands. Their destination is the “Fire,” where they are punished with boiling water and fierce hot winds.

The Foremost (As-Sabiqun): A third, elite group (the “Outrunners”) who are nearest to God, consisting of prophets and the most pious. 

The Bible

The New Testament provides the most explicit definition of these groups in Matthew 25:31-46, known as the Parable of the Sheep and the Goats:

The Party of the Right (The Sheep): At the final judgment, Jesus places the “sheep”—those who showed compassion, fed the hungry, and clothed the naked—on His right. They are called “blessed” and inherit the Kingdom.

The Party of the Left (The Goats): Those who neglected the needy are placed on the left. They are referred to as “cursed” and depart into “eternal fire”.

Symbolism of Status: Throughout the Bible, the “right hand” is the side of power, honor, and salvation (e.g., Jesus is seated at the right hand of God), while the left often signifies judgment or lesser status. 

The Torah

The Torah focuses predominantly on earthly rewards and the physical world rather than a detailed “Party of the Left or Right” in the afterlife. However, it sets the precedent for the symbolism used later: 

The Right for Blessing: In Genesis 48, Jacob (Israel) intentionally places his right hand on the younger son Ephraim to grant him a greater blessing, signaling that the right hand is the vehicle for divine favor.

Spiritual vs. Physical: Hebraic thought often views the “right” as the spiritual realm and the “left” as the physical or temporal realm. In Ecclesiastes 10:2 (part of the broader Hebrew Bible/Tanakh), it states: “A wise man’s heart inclines to the right, but a fool’s heart to the left”.”

THE DISTINGUISHING DEEDS

What deeds distinguish the companions of the right from those of the left?

GoogleAI Mode: “In the Qur’an and Bible, the distinction between these two groups is defined by specific behaviors, while the Torah focuses on the foundational virtues and laws that separate the righteous from the wicked.

1. The Qur’an

The Qur’an details specific deeds in Surah Al-Balad (90:11-18) and Surah Al-Waqi’ah (56:27-56) that define each group. 

Companions of the Right: They are distinguished by “climbing the steep path,” which includes:

Social Justice: Freeing a slave or feeding the hungry during times of famine.

Compassion: Caring for an orphaned relative or a needy person in distress.

Faith and Community: Believing in God and advising one another to be patient and compassionate.

Companions of the Left: They are defined by their rejection of divine guidance and persistent sin:

Denial: Disbelieving in God’s revelations and signs.

Materialism: Persisting in “great sin” while indulging in luxury and denying the Day of Resurrection. 

2. The Bible

In Matthew 25:31-46, Jesus explicitly lists the “active compassion” that separates the “sheep” (Right) from the “goats” (Left). 

The Sheep (Right): Their faith is evidenced by selfless acts of mercy:

Feeding and Hydrating: Giving food to the hungry and water to the thirsty.

Hospitality: Welcoming strangers.

Care for the Vulnerable: Clothing the naked, visiting the sick, and coming to those in prison.

The Goats (Left): They are condemned not necessarily for active evil, but for indifference. They saw the same suffering and chose to do nothing. 

3. The Torah

While the Torah does not use the specific phrasing “Party of the Left/Right” for the afterlife, it distinguishes the Righteous from the Wicked through their adherence to the Covenant. 

The Righteous: Defined by “delighting in the law of the Lord” (Psalm 1:2) and practicing justice and charity (tzedakah). They are “generous and give” (Psalm 37:21).

The Wicked: Characterized by “pride” and “iniquity”. They are those who “borrow but do not pay back” and “draw the sword to bring down the poor” (Psalm 37:14, 21).

Summary of Distinguishing Criteria

Group 
Right

Primary Deed/Trait
Active Mercy

Scriptural Example
Feeding the hungry, freeing captives, showing patience.

Group
Left

Primary Deed/Trait
Indifference/Denial

Scriptural Example
Ignoring the needy, rejecting signs, and pursuing greed.”

THE PARADISE FAMILIES: THE COMPANIONS

Explain: Pure companions. Does the Qur’an indicate multiple?

GoogleAI Mode: “In the Qur’an, the term for “pure companions” is Hoor (Ḥūr). Linguistically and contextually, the text uses plural forms to describe these beings, though it does not specify a fixed number for each person.

The Meaning of “Hoor”

The word Hoor (found in Surahs 44:54, 52:20, 55:72, and 56:22) refers to beings characterized by purity and striking beauty of the eyes: 

Linguistic Root: The term is the plural of both ahwar (masculine) and hawra (feminine). It literally describes eyes with an intense contrast between the deep black of the pupil and the pure whiteness of the sclera.

Attributes: They are described as “hidden pearls” or “protected eggs,” symbolizing their untouched and precious nature. They are “purified spouses” (azwājun muṭahharatun) who are free from worldly flaws, both physical and spiritual. 

Does the Qur’an indicate multiple?

Plural Usage: The Qur’an always mentions these companions in the plural form (Hoor) rather than a singular form. This suggests a state of abundance and companionship rather than a single individual.

No Specific Number: Unlike the commonly cited (but often disputed) figure of 72, which originates from Hadith traditions rather than the Qur’an, the Qur’an itself never specifies a number of companions.

Gender Neutrality: While traditionally interpreted as female maidens, many linguistic scholars and modern commentators note that the plural Hoor can apply to both male and female pure beings, serving as companions for all righteous believers. 

Contextual Distinction

The Qur’an mentions these companions as a reward for both the Foremost and the Companions of the Right, but they are listed as a specific honor for the “Foremost” to complete their divine hospitality. Additionally, other verses indicate that righteous earthly spouses will be reunited with their partners in Paradise, transformed into a state of eternal youth and purity.”

2026 APPLICATION: NUCLEAR WEAPONS DISARMAMENT

PART I

How does this apply in 2026 in a world with nine nuclear weapons nations while both the UN & Congress are paralyzed?

GoogleAI Mode: “In 2026, the scriptural categories of the Right, Left, and the Foremost translate into ethical postures toward a world facing unprecedented existential risk. As of January 2026, the global nuclear framework is in a state of near-total collapse, creating a modern parallel to the moral crossroads described in sacred texts.

The Party of the Left: Indifference and Escalation

In 2026, the “Party of the Left”—scripturally defined by indifference to suffering and the pursuit of power over mercy—parallels the current global paralysis:

Treaty Expiration: The New START treaty between the U.S. and Russia is set to expire on February 5, 2026. Its lapse will remove the last legal limits on the world’s two largest nuclear arsenals for the first time since 1972.

Political Deadlock: Both the UN Security Council and the U.S. Congress remain largely gridlocked, unable to forge new arms-control agreements despite the Doomsday Clock remaining at a critical 89 seconds to midnight.

Scriptural Application: The “Left” represents those who prioritize “amassing wealth” and weapons over human life (Qur’an 104:2) or those who see “strangers” (the global community) in need of peace but offer no help (Matthew 25:42-43). 

The Party of the Right: Protection and Mercy

The “Party of the Right” is defined by active compassion and the protection of life. In 2026, this translates to: 

Humanitarian Advocacy: Groups like Christian CND and the Holy See argue that nuclear weapons are inherently contrary to the “Right’s” mandate to preserve the innocent.

Adherence to Limits: Scripturally, the “Right” follows limits. In 2026, this applies to the call for nations to honor the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) even as the April 2026 Review Conference faces potential failure.

Scriptural Application: This group fulfills the biblical command to “seek peace and pursue it” (Psalm 34:14) and the Qur’anic duty to feed the hungry and free the captives, seeing nuclear disarmament as a form of global social justice. 

The ‘Foremost’: Moral Leadership in Crisis

The “Foremost” (As-Sabiqun) are those who do not wait for the majority to act. In 2026, they are identified by:

Moral Intransigence: Leaders and individuals who advocate for peace when it is unpopular or “politically impossible”.

The Apostolic Posture: For example, Pope Leo XIV has called for an “unarmed and disarming peace” in his 2026 prayer intentions, positioning those who pursue absolute disarmament as the spiritual “near” to God.

Scriptural Application: They represent the “outrunners” who take the “steep path” (Qur’an 90:11) of preventing the “crushing punishment” of fire (nuclear heat) from reaching the hearts of humanity.”

PART II

What actions define the ‘Party of the Right’ in the context of nuclear disarmament?

GoogleAI Mode: “In 2026, as the New START treaty expires and the NPT Review Conference convenes in April, the scriptural “Party of the Right” is defined by actions that prioritize the preservation of God’s creation and the protection of the innocent from indiscriminate destruction.

Based on the Qur’an, Bible, and Torah, the actions defining this group in a nuclear context are:

1. Prioritizing Life Over Deterrence (The Sanctity of Creation)

The Party of the Right acts on the principle that the possession and threat of nuclear weapons is a “direct affront” to spiritual beliefs. 

Bible/Torah: Following the mandate of the Sanctity of Life, they reject nuclear deterrence as immoral because it holds civilian populations “hostage” to potential annihilation.

Qur’an: They advocate for the Islamic principle that weapons must be restricted to specific military targets; because nuclear weapons are inherently indiscriminate and kill “old men, children, or women,” their use and deployment are considered Haram (forbidden). 

2. Active Pursuit of Disarmament Treaties

The righteous are not passive; they take the “steep path” of active peacemaking.

The TPNW Mandate: They support the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which entered into force as a legal and moral instrument to delegitimize the very existence of these weapons.

Global Security Assurances: They demand “unequivocal, unconditional, and legally binding security assurances” that nuclear-weapon states will never use or threaten to use these weapons against non-nuclear states. 

3. Breaking Political Paralysis Through Moral Leadership

Where Congress and the UN are gridlocked, the Party of the Right—often led by “The Foremost” (As-Sabiqun)—acts as a moral vanguard:

Apostolic Advocacy: Following the leadership of figures like Pope Leo XIV, who has intensified the Catholic Church’s condemnation of the mere possession of nuclear weapons as immoral.

Civil Disobedience: This includes individuals like Sister Carol Gilbert and other faith-based activists who engage in “resisting war and nuclear weapons” through non-violent protest and legal challenges even when states refuse to act. 

4. Applying the Principles of “Transparency and Irreversibility”

In 2026, the righteous emphasize three technical and moral pillars for disarmament:

Transparency: Openness about nuclear stockpiles to build trust.

Irreversibility: Ensuring that when weapons are dismantled, they cannot be rebuilt, honoring the spirit of “beating swords into plowshares” (Isaiah 2:4).

Verifiability: Accepting international inspections to ensure universal safety. 

Summary of 2026 Actions

Action Type
Protective

Scriptural Basis
Preservation of Life

Modern 2026 Application
Banning fissile material production

Action Type 
Prophetic

Scriptural Basis
Speaking Truth to Power

Modern 2026 Application
Condemning nuclear threats as “outright prohibited”.

Action Type
Restorative

Scriptural Basis
Healing Creation

Modern 2026 Application
Environmental remediation for nuclear testing sites.

Action
Diplomatic

Scriptural Basis
Seeking Peace

Modern 2026 Application
Establishing the Middle East Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone.”

ARMAGEDDON IN 2026

How does Armageddon relate in 2026?

GoogleAI Mode: “In 2026, Armageddon serves as both a scriptural event and a modern metaphor for the “tipping point” of human survival. As of January 15, 2026, the term is used to frame the existential danger posed by the expiration of nuclear treaties and the failure of international diplomacy. 

1. Geopolitical Context: “Nuclear Armageddon”

In modern discourse, Armageddon is synonymous with global nuclear annihilation. This relationship is particularly acute in 2026 for several reasons:

The Expiration of New START: On February 5, 2026, the New START treaty—the last remaining arms control agreement between the U.S. and Russia—is scheduled to expire. Experts warn that its lapse could trigger an “uncontrolled arms race,” moving the world into a new era where major powers can ramp up nuclear warfighting capabilities without restriction.

The Doomsday Clock: As of early 2026, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has set the Doomsday Clock at 89 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been to cataclysm. This reflects “imminent and obvious” danger from nuclear modernization, climate change, and AI-driven vulnerabilities.

The 2026 NPT Review Conference: The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference in April 2026 is viewed as a “reckoning point” to avoid a “Doomsday” scenario for international stability. 

2. Scriptural Relationship: A War of Choice

Theological interpretations in 2026 emphasize that Armageddon (referenced only once in the Bible in Revelation 16:16) is not just an inevitable end-time event but a consequence of moral choices. 

A “Battle of Allegiance”: Many scholars argue that Armageddon represents the “crux of spiritual warfare” over hearts and minds. In 2026, this translates to the choice between the Party of the Left (indifference, escalation, and the “Armageddon complex” of seeking conflict) and the Party of the Right (mercy, preservation of life, and disarmament).

The Location: While often associated with the Plain of Megiddo in Israel, scriptural analysis suggests “Armageddon” is a symbolic worldwide situation where human governments assemble in a “last stand” against divine rule—which, in a 2026 context, is often equated with the rejection of peace and justice in favor of power. 

3. The Tipping Point of 2026

Current global risks—from AI anxiety to great-power competition—have led commentators to describe 2026 as a “year of global readjustment” that will test humanity’s ability to avoid the “brutality in geopolitics.” The “Party of the Right” is identified by those who view Armageddon not as an inevitable fate to be embraced, but as a “warning that humanity needs to make major changes to avoid self-destruction.””

THE SOLUTIONS TO PREVENT ARMAGEDDON

What are the 5/5 solutions to prevent self-destruction?

GoogleAI Mode: “In 2026, leading global policy advocates such as Back from the Brink and the Union of Concerned Scientists have identified five critical solutions to prevent nuclear self-destruction and move the world back from the “precipice”. 

1. Pursue Global Elimination

The highest priority is negotiating a verifiable, enforceable agreement among all nine nuclear-armed states to dismantle their arsenals. 

Advocates emphasize using the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) as a legal framework to transition from a world of deterrence to one of total abolition.

With the New START treaty expiring on February 5, 2026, immediate negotiations for a successor or interim limit are essential to prevent an uncontrolled arms race. 

2. Renounce “First Use”

Nations should adopt a No-First-Use (NFU) policy, formally declaring they will never be the first to use nuclear weapons in a conflict. 

This policy reduces the pressure on adversaries to “launch first or lose their weapons,” thereby lowering the risk of a conventional conflict escalating into a nuclear war. 

3. End Sole Launch Authority

Currently, the U.S. and other nations often grant a single individual (such as a president) unchecked power to order a nuclear strike. 

Proposed solutions include requiring congressional approval or the consent of multiple high-level officials to ensure no single person can unilaterally initiate a global catastrophe. 

4. Take Weapons Off “Hair-Trigger” Alert

Thousands of warheads are kept on high alert, ready to launch within minutes. This increases the risk of an accidental launch due to false alarms or cyber-attacks. 

“De-alerting” involves increasing the time required to launch, such as storing warheads separately from their delivery missiles, providing leaders with more time for deliberate decision-making. 

5. Cancel Modernization and Reinvest

The U.S. and other powers are currently engaged in a massive modernization of their nuclear triads. 

Solutions include canceling the development of “enhanced” or more usable nuclear weapons and redirecting the estimated $100 billion spent annually on these programs toward human needs like health, climate protection, and sustainable development.”

THE TRUMP SOLE AUTHORITY OVER THE LAUNCH OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS

PART I: THE PROBLEM

Donald J. Trump has the sole authority to start ARMAGEDDON if he chooses to engage in a nuclear weapons strike?

GoogleAI Mode: “In 2026, the President of the United States, currently Donald J. Trump, maintains sole authority to order the launch of nuclear weapons. This long-standing policy, established at the start of the atomic age, remains the operational standard despite ongoing legislative efforts to reform it. 

Status of Nuclear Launch Authority in 2026

Exclusive Command: The president does not require the concurrence of military leaders or the U.S. Congress to authorize a nuclear strike. While the president may consult with advisors, there is no legal requirement to do so, and they can order a launch even over the objections of every advisor.

Military Obligation: Under the current chain of command, military service members are required to execute all legal orders to launch nuclear weapons. While a commander could theoretically refuse an order they deem illegal under the Law of Armed Conflict, the system is designed for speed and immediate execution.

Legislative Challenges: As of January 2026, members of Congress continue to introduce legislation, such as the Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act, which seeks to require a congressional declaration of war before any first use of nuclear weapons. However, these measures have not yet been signed into law and face significant political hurdles. 

The “Armageddon” Context in 2026

The term “Armageddon” is frequently used in 2026 to describe the risks associated with the expiration of global arms controls:

Treaty Expiration: The New START treaty between the U.S. and Russia is set to expire on February 5, 2026. Its lapse would remove the final legal limits on the world’s two largest nuclear arsenals, potentially triggering an unconstrained arms race.

Presidential Stance: President Trump has stated, “If it expires, it expires,” regarding New START, suggesting he may prefer to negotiate a “better agreement” rather than extend the current pact.

Modernization: In December 2025, President Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2026, which continues the modernization of the U.S. nuclear triad, including the Sentinel ICBM program.”

PART II: THE SOLUTIONS

What are the 5/5 solutions to preventing self-destruction initiated by Trump?

GoogleAI Mode: “In 2026, with Donald J. Trump exercising sole launch authority and the New START treaty set to expire on February 5, 2026, advocacy groups like Back from the Brink and the Union of Concerned Scientists have proposed five specific policy solutions to prevent nuclear self-destruction. 

The “5/5” Policy Solutions

End Sole, Unchecked Presidential Authority: Currently, a U.S. president can order a nuclear strike without consulting anyone. Proposed reforms would require a check by at least one other high-ranking official—such as the Secretary of Defense or the Attorney General—to certify that a launch order is both authentic and legal.

Renounce “First Use”: The U.S. should adopt a No-First-Use (NFU) policy, declaring it will never be the first to use nuclear weapons in a conflict. Legislative efforts like the Restricting First Use of Nuclear Weapons Act of 2025 (H.R. 669/S. 192) seek to prohibit any first-use strike without an explicit declaration of war by Congress.

Take Weapons Off “Hair-Trigger” Alert: Approximately 400 U.S. missiles are kept on high alert, ready to launch within minutes of a presidential order. “De-alerting” these weapons—by storing warheads separately from their missiles—would provide leaders more time for deliberate decision-making and reduce the risk of a launch caused by a false alarm.

Cancel the Plan to Replace the Entire Arsenal: The U.S. is currently executing a 30-year, $1.7 trillion modernization plan for its nuclear triad. Solutions include canceling “enhanced” weapons like the Sentinel ICBM and redirecting those funds toward human needs and climate protection.

Pursue Global Elimination Through a Verifiable Agreement: The U.S. should lead a global effort to negotiate a verifiable, time-bound agreement among all nuclear-armed states to eliminate their arsenals. Advocates urge the U.S. to participate in the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) as a path toward this goal. 

2026 Contextual Challenges

Treaty Expiration: The New START treaty is scheduled to expire on February 5, 2026. Its lapse would remove the last remaining legal limits on the world’s two largest nuclear arsenals.

Trump Administration Policy: President Trump signed the FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act on December 18, 2025, which continues funding for nuclear modernization. His administration has previously moved to broaden the scenarios for “first use” to include responses to non-nuclear strategic attacks.”